Log in

Home | Dashboard



StepRep updated, MyFrontSteps animated.

June 5th, 2009 by Michael A. Charles

It’s been a busy week in blog-land.

At the MyFrontSteps Blog we unveiled four new cartoons. Robert Scoble, Vanessa Fox, Alice Myerhoff of Inman News, and Jennifer Pahlka of Web 2.0 Expo answered the question, “What have you done to make your house a home?”

Meanwhile, over on the StepRep Blog, I talked about the latest Facebook-related updates to the product. We’ve got a new way of integrating StepRep with your Facebook account, and a new way to interact with potential customers from our Facebook app, Homebook.

Homebook – ready to fly!

June 2nd, 2009 by Michael A. Charles

This is turning into quite the little blog network around here. Along with our sister site the StepRep Blog, we’ve recently added the MyFrontSteps Blog, which would be – I don’t know, a crazy old aunt?

Right now our crazy old aunt is rattling on about Homebook, our new Facebook application.

Three flavours of bad review.

May 7th, 2009 by Michael A. Charles

Search Engine Optimization Journal points me to an interesting post by Jeff Sexton at Grokdotcom. Jeff is talking about how negative reviews on your website can actually improve your reputation:

It all boils down to credibility. Customer reviews simply have more credibility than your sales copy, so they inspire more confidence in the buyer. And negative reviews lend credibility to the review process itself, standing as visible proof that the reviews are not edited.

Of course, if all your reviews are bad, then reputation management is the least of your problems: there’s probably something seriously wrong with your product or service.

But Jeff makes a pretty good case that if you sweep bad reviews under the rug you’ll do more harm than good, and he gives an example from his own online shopping experience. Bad reviews just wind up migrating to other sectors of the web where searchers will still find them and where you’ll lose your power to respond. Anyway his post is worth a read.

He got me thinking about my own experiences with bad reviews, and how I’ve chosen to deal with them. Now, I’m not a Persuasion Architect like Jeff Sexton (though like him, I’ve had the privilege of making up my own silly job title: Cartoonist-in-Chief), so bear in mind that these are the ramblings of an amateur.

Seems to me there are three kinds of negative reviews:

  • Case 1: You’ve genuinely screwed up and the reviewer is calling you on it.
  • Case 2: You haven’t really screwed up, but because of miscommunication or misunderstanding, the reviewer thinks you have.
  • Case 3: The reviewer is just a jerk.

In all three cases, you may be strongly tempted to just delete the review and pretend it never happened. But if you do, you’re missing an opportunity.

In Case 1, you deserved the bad review. Hopefully you’ll learn from it and do a better job next time. In any event, here’s a chance to demonstrate how on-the-ball you are. Leave a follow-up comment. Explain how you goofed and why it won’t happen again. Offer to make good. A bad review with a timely follow-up is almost as good as a good review, for the reason Jeff Sexton mentioned: credibility. A good review could be from anyone, but only the most paranoid visitor would accuse you of making up bad reviews and sticking them on your site.

In Case 2, you haven’t really screwed up, but because of confusion or bad information the reviewer thinks you have. Most likely this communication breakdown is due to clumsiness on your part: bad site design, fuzzy writing, a failure to make your product or service clear to outsiders. Then again, maybe your reviewer just isn’t very bright. Either way, now’s your chance to clear up the misunderstanding. Your follow-up comment will simultaneously demonstrate your attentiveness and help other confused visitors see the light.

In Case 3, someone is just yankin’ your chain. Don’t let it be yanked. Again, the follow-up comment is a valuable tool: blatant falsehoods can be corrected, insults can be deflected with good humour. (Outright slanders can just be ignored.) The goal here is simple: to demonstrate that you’re the bigger person and get visitors on your side.

Again, I’m not a Persuasion Architect; I’m just an average schmuck with his own set of biases. My preference is for openness and engagement, and luckily I work for a company that shares those values.

It’s something to think about, though. There’s a lot of hostility floating around the internet – for every honest, thoughtful, constructively-critical review on the web, there are a hundred imbecilic bleats. I suppose it has a lot to do with users being able to remain anonymous; there’s little incentive to restrain their worst impulses. Perhaps the growth of online communities like MyFrontSteps, communities with social context – where if you act like a jerk, all your real-world friends will see it – will help mitigate some of this rudeness. In the meantime, what’s the best way to deal with this culture of negativity?

StepRep on your Facebook profile …sort of.

May 1st, 2009 by Michael A. Charles

We’ve had a few enquiries from attentive viewers of the Spokesmonster cartoons. “Hey,” they say, “in one of the cartoons you promised we’d be able to add the StepRep widget to our Facebook profiles. When’s that happenin’, ya slackers?”

Well, the development team is working on a way to push stories from StepRep into your Facebook account. We’ll let you know the minute that happens. But in the meantime, there’s a cheat you might like to try.

If you go to the Facebook application directory and do a search for “RSS”, you’ll find a whole whack of apps with names like RSS-Connect, Simply RSS, and Blog RSS Feed Reader (to name only the first three that come up). These apps allow you to add an RSS feed to your Facebook profile.

Now, back in StepRep, go to the Widget Settings screen and right-click and copy the location of the little link that says RSS Feed. Carry that address over to Facebook and paste it into whichever one of the RSS apps you’ve chosen to install, and voila, there’s your StepRep widget, right smack on your Facebook profile. Your friends can see the stories you’ve chosen to promote, and you can stop blaming that clown who made the cartoon for getting a little ahead of himself.

By the way, we’re not endorsing any of these RSS apps, so if this trick doesn’t work for you, don’t come running to us.

***

In other news, we now own the domain steprep.com. Previously some wretched cyber-squatter had taken residence there, but we finally convinced him to drag his smelly sleeping bag off our doorstep.

So now if you suffer memory failure, or if you lose all your bookmarks, you won’t have to scratch your head over where to find us. Just type “steprep.com” into your address bar and by the mighty magic of the 301 redirect you’ll be whisked to our home at steprep.myfrontsteps.com.

***

Update 3:03 pm – a few minutes after I finished this post, I received word that the development team had just released an update. I talk about the new “My Content” button and “Promote this” checkbox over on the StepRep Blog.

Introducing Homebook.

April 24th, 2009 by Michael A. Charles

Scoot over to the StepRep Blog to read about the newest subdivision in the MyFrontSteps community – Homebook. (Tagline: “Where your friends live…online.”) Homebook is a place to hang out with your friends and talk about your homes. We’ve just released the app for Facebook and MySpace:

Homebook on Facebook
Homebook on MySpace

The mysterious StepRep referral model.

April 22nd, 2009 by Michael A. Charles

A couple weeks ago I wrote a post called Selling sunrise. The gist of it was that no matter how great your product is, it will live or die based on how well it is marketed. Whether you’re selling soap, or sliced bread, or sunrise – if people don’t understand how your product will improve their lives, they’re not going to use it.

Here’s a good example. After watching the most recent Spokesmonster cartoon, which deals with referral fees (a feature that’s still in development), a guy named Doug made the following comment:

That is a terrible business model. $100 for a referral. As an interior painter I would not pay $10 for a customer referral until I have been paid by that customer.

Doug’s right – $100 for a referral is a lousy deal if you don’t get a guaranteed sale out of it. That’s why with StepRep you don’t pay a dime unless you complete a transaction.

This is hugely important, and I guess the point wasn’t made clearly enough in the cartoon – anyway, not clearly enough for Doug. Let me run through how the referral model will work.

1) You don’t have to offer a referral fee if you don’t want to. You can just use StepRep to monitor and manage your online reputation – for free – and ignore all the extra features.

2) You set the amount of the referral fee. We don’t know how big your business is. You could be peddling fifty-cent shoelaces or million-dollar yachts. Only you know how large a fee you’re prepared to offer.

3) The fee is split 50/50 between the new customer and the referring customer. That’s why I worry that the term “referral fee” might be confusing (and if you have a better phrase, get in touch with me). Really what you’re offering is a referral fee plus a discount.

–and most importantly–

4) You don’t pay a dime unless you make an actual sale. It doesn’t cost you anything to offer a referral fee, and if no-one takes you up on the offer, that’s okay, you can just go on promoting your business the old-fashioned way – radio ads, coupons in the mail, paying some kid to dress up as a giant cheeseburger and stand on the street corner waving.

The referral fees won’t be coming along for another few months. Hopefully by the time this feature is ready, we’ll have a better sense of how to get the idea across to new users. Meanwhile, thanks for the feedback, Doug.

Selling sunrise.

March 31st, 2009 by Michael A. Charles

Springtime is here – even in the Canadian prairies. It makes a big difference, waking up to sunshine rather than chilly darkness. This morning my alarm went off at 7:30 and I was glad to see that it was already full daylight outside. I lay in bed for a while and thought about the word “sunrise”.

The sun doesn’t really rise. It stays where it is, and the rotation of the earth causes us to fall out of shadow and into the sun’s light. The word “sunrise” reflects an ancient, intuitive, pre-Copernican conception of how the universe works. But it’s the perfect word. You couldn’t possibly do better.

Let’s say you’re in marketing and your boss asks you to develop a pitch for a new feature. “People on our side of the planet are tired of this constant darkness,” your boss might say. “Electricity bills are through the roof. Plants aren’t growing. We’re always bumping into things. So we’ve decided to rotate the earth once every 24 hours, so that for 12 hours out of every 24, this side of the planet will get direct sunlight.”

“What a great idea!” you say. “What are we calling it?”

“Well,” says your boss, “that’s where you come in.”

So you sit there spinning your globe, trying to come up with a good, concise, marketable description of this new feature.

Hemispheric illumination shift?

Rotational shadow escape?

Sunward earth turning?

Ugh. A PR campaign can probably be built around sunward earth turning to convince people of its benefits. But who’s going to get up at 5 AM to watch it happen?

There are two components to marketing. First, you need to make a complicated new thing seem straightforward and familiar to an audience that probably isn’t paying much attention.

Second, you need to make it – for want of a better word – beautiful.

I’ve been trying, in the Spokesmonster cartoons and on this blog, to get across the benefits of a service that offers a lot of great features – some of them hard to explain in ten words or less. Hopefully I’ve been making a bit of progress. But I still haven’t come across that magic phrase that makes everything clear and beautiful.

Nothing to do but keep trying. Meanwhile, I’m convinced that, like sunrise, StepRep sells itself – once people experience it for themselves.

140 characters in search of an author.

March 26th, 2009 by Michael A. Charles

Over at the StepRep blog, Jeff has a link to an interesting news item: Twitter has made a small change to its profile pages which might make a big difference in future Google results.

I should start by saying: I don’t really “get” Twitter. I suppose I might come around. I’m one of those cats who won’t eat his food when it’s served in a new bowl. I resisted joining Facebook for almost a year, to the exasperation of my friends. Then I joined, and now I…well, I still don’t really “get” Facebook, actually. I think it’s clunky and poorly organised. And I really didn’t need to reconnect with that old high school acquaintance who now spends his days SuperPoking everyone he ever met. But thanks to Facebook, I have enjoyed some rousing games of online Scrabble, and at least my friends don’t crack jokes about what an old man I am any more.

It’s funny. Twitter is getting a reputation as a place where loud-mouthed narcissists blab about watching TV and cutting their toenails. As you’ll recall, when blogging first emerged as a fad a couple years ago, it got the same rap. But in spite of all the bad press, I embraced blogging easily while I’ve resisted Twitter.

Why? It’s simple. Twitter demands brevity. I’m a windy writer. I exhale in complete paragraphs. If I have something to say, it probably can’t be said using less than five hundred words. A hundred and forty characters? What can you say in a hundred and forty characters? It takes me a hundred and forty characters just to furrow my brow in preparation for writing.

Trying to sell me on Twitter is like trying to sell a fat guy a Smart Car. He might be able to squeeze himself behind the steering wheel, but he’ll never be comfortable. He needs a minivan or an SUV – something that leaves room for him to fan out his flab.

I need a blog to fan out my flab.

I’m not dissing Twitter, any more than I’m dissing Smart Cars. If you’re comfortable with that 140-character limit, great. If you can find ways to be interesting within that limit, better still: you’re a far more disciplined writer than I am. As Blaise Pascal said, apologising for the length of one of his letters: “I would not have made this so long except that I do not have the leisure to make it shorter.”

Perhaps I could compress this blog post to 140 characters. But I’m too busy.

StepRep, sarsaparilla, and brand name recognition.

March 19th, 2009 by Michael A. Charles

There’s an old saying and I don’t know where it came from and I’ll probably quote it wrong. It’s a piece of advice about how to structure speeches. It goes something like this:

First, tell them what you’re going to tell them.
Then, tell them.
Then, tell them what you’ve told them.

You could paraphrase the above as: always assume your audience isn’t paying attention.

I think it’s pretty good advice, whether you’re giving a speech or marketing a product. Even when they’re looking right at you, people’s thoughts are often far, far away – as far away as Mars is from Earth. If you send out just one probe, it might get lost in space, or burn up in the atmosphere, or crash in the mountains. Better to send out two or three probes and hope one makes it to the surface safely.

Sadly, a marketing career based on repetition, repetition, and more repetition can get a little…well, repetitive. As one of those fancy-schmancy tea-drinking corduroy-wearing “creative” types, I get bored with writing assignments that merely require me to rearrange last week’s sales pitch. Haven’t I explained StepRep often enough? Can’t I move on to something different?

This week I’ve had a few “rearrangement” assignments sitting on my desk, and I’ve been having a hard time getting into them. I’ve been trying to come up with a different angle. A friend of mine called up and left me a voicemail where he outlined an analogy he thought I could use. I’ve paraphrased him quite a bit, but here’s what my friend had to say:

Remember the popular girl in high school? It didn’t matter what she did – it didn’t matter how boring her life was – people couldn’t stop talking about her. Maybe she broke up with her boyfriend, or crashed her car. Maybe she just chipped a nail. Somehow, whatever she did, no matter how mundane, word got around. She was at the center of the conversation. People flocked around her.

Meanwhile, the uncool kids wandered the corridors, feeling invisible and isolated. Their tastes were a little more obscure – they were into opera, or poetry, or model trains. Without hangers-on to gossip about them and spread the word about what they were doing, it was difficult for the opera buffs and the poets and the model train enthusiasts to connect with one another.

What the popular girl had, what the unpopular kids lacked, was brand name recognition. In effect, gossip did for the popular girl what billboards and TV ads do for Coke: made her ubiquitous. If you’ve got an appetite for a soft drink, the word Coke is never far from the front of your mind. Maybe if you stopped to think about it, you’d decide that you’d much prefer a bottle of Boot Hill Sassparilla. But you don’t stop think about it. The waitress asks you what you’d like, and you name the first drink that comes to mind, and Coke is it.

Now, ubiquity is not something that can be acquired on the cheap. Coca-Cola spends a fortune keeping its brand in the public eye. But you probably don’t want to be Coca-Cola. You’re content to be Boot Hill Sassparilla – provided that the people who like sarsaparilla know where to find you.

StepRep can’t make sarsaparilla as famous as Coca-Cola. But if you’re a sarsaparilla maker, you can use StepRep to help ensure that people see your brand when they’re searching for sarsaparilla.

StepRep can’t make poets as popular as cheerleaders. But if you’re a high school poet, you can use StepRep to help build your brand name recognition within that small circle of high school poetry fans.

There! That’s a pitch I haven’t tried before.

I feel refreshed.

PS. I tried Boot Hill Sassparilla on a visit to Santa Fe a few years back, and thought it was pretty good. I think it’s local to the southwest – you can’t get it where I live. I hope they’re still making the stuff.

Addressing the StepRep skeptics.

March 13th, 2009 by Michael A. Charles

After I posted the most recent Spokesmonster cartoon yesterday, I sent the link around to all my friends and invited their comments. One friend, a StepRep user, emailed back with his thoughts on StepRep and the whole concept of online reputation management, and I thought I’d address his arguments here.

He wrote:

I have not really added anything to my StepRep profile page because … I kinda thought that the system does not really make any sense. If everyone knows that the page is managing your reputation, then they know that it is only showing the good stories about you and leaving out the bad stories. If I wanted to buy something for my house, I want to read all the bad stories about the contractor, not read his “managed” page which only tells me the good things. Why would anyone read a StepRep page when they know it is clearly biased?

The guys at the French website L’Atelier raised a similar point when they reviewed StepRep a few months ago. And it’s a good question, a question we’re going to have to learn to confront if we want the site to keep growing.

Here’s how I’d respond to my friend:

“Bad stories” only tell you so much.

Your argument is kind of like saying, “Why would anyone ever go to the Air Canada website? Air Canada isn’t going to share all the bad stories about flight delays and grumpy flight attendants.” But “bad stories” aren’t the only things consumers are looking for online.

If someone is trying to decide whether to hire you as (say) a contractor, one of the things that person might look at is a site that offers unbiased reviews. But once he’s decided to hire you, the unbiased reviews aren’t going to give him your phone number, or link to your blog and your Facebook page, or link to stories that have appeared about you in the local press, or show who you’ve worked for in the past, or link to photos of the actual work you’ve done. Your StepRep profile page will do all that.

Building a reputation based on trust.

Down the line, as the StepRep / MyFrontSteps community grows, your StepRep profile will also give visitors valuable information about your reputation: they’ll be able to see which consumers have endorsed you or linked to you as a “trusted service provider”. If visitors are MyFrontSteps users themselves, they’ll be able to use the StepRep Directory to find the service providers that their friends trust and recommend. This is a far more valuable piece of information than some anonymous whine left on a discussion board somewhere.

Influencing search engine results.

Of course consumers won’t treat your StepRep profile page as if it’s the only source of information about your business. They’ll look at other sites that come up when they Google your name. But here’s where StepRep comes in handy. Because StepRep was designed to be very attractive to search robots, the links leading from your widget and profile page to the stories you’ve marked as “good” will influence search engines to give more weight to those stories.

The results probably won’t be dramatic. StepRep’s influence might be just enough to nudge positive stories a little higher in the search results, where people are more likely to see them.

(PS. MyFrontSteps’ Jeff Tomlin had a great post a while back about how Google ranks pages. Reading it will help to explain how the StepRep profile page and widget work.)

Making yourself a little more Google-friendly.

In the second Spokesmonster cartoon, where we talked about online reputation management, maybe we made it seem like the objective was only to chase away criticism and negative reviews. And sometimes that’s part of it. But there’s another objective which is likely to resonate for many folks who run small businesses – folks who might not have much of an online presence right now. And that’s simply helping searchers to find you when they Google your name.

Say you’ve got a fairly common name, like – oh, I don’t know, Michael A. Charles. Googling my name brings up a whole lot of irrelevant results – irrelevant to me, I mean – like the American artist Michael Ray Charles, the Australian blues guitarist Michael Charles, the Houston dentist Michael A. Charles.

By using my StepRep widget and profile page to aggregate and link to all the sites that refer to me – the real Michael A. Charles – I can influence Google so that it’s more likely to put those sites in the first page of results, where more people will see them. And that Aussie guitarist can slink back down to the second page where he belongs.

Does it all seem a little complicated?

As you can see, I’m still figuring out how to make these arguments as brief and punchy as possible. StepRep has a lot of different angles – notice I didn’t even mention quotes and referral fees, which are the subject of the most recent cartoon.

But really the best selling point is that it’s all free. You can set up an account in about two minutes. Try it out, explore the site, maybe add the StepRep widget to your blog or website, see if it makes any difference to your Google results.

Meanwhile I’ll work on polishing my rhetorical skills.