Log in

Home | Dashboard


Categories » ‘Uncategorized’

“Very Bad Trip”: an interesting diversion.

February 11th, 2010 by Michael A. Charles

I’m on vacation, sunning on a patio in Palm Springs while my unfortunate colleagues shiver back home in Saskatoon.

But I’m still keeping up with my email. StepRep brought me an interesting result this morning. A while back my band Sea Water Bliss put out a low-budget music video that became moderately popular, especially in Europe. The video has appeared in a bunch of blogs written in a bunch of languages that I can’t read.

Thanks to StepRep’s Reputation Monitor, I receive regular updates on my band’s virtual tour of the Old World. Today I was alerted to the fact that our video had appeared on the French blog Fumez La Moquette (“Steam The Carpet”).

Un travail de titan pour un résultat bluffant,” reads the caption – “A titanic labour for an awesome result.” Nice.

Having by now seen my video praised as well as belittled in numerous online forums, I hardly needed to strain my tenth-grade French skills to interpret what the commenters were saying about it. Most of them liked it, some snarked about it, and a few wondered how many trees were chopped down to make it. (The answer is “many”.) But this comment piqued my curiosity:

sinon le bassiste dans la vidéo me fait pensée à l’acteur dans Very bad trip le beau frère louche

(“By the way, the bassist in this video makes me think of the actor in Very Bad Trip, the dissipated brother-in-law.”)

It took some Googling to figure out that Very Bad Trip is the title under which the film The Hangover was released in France and Belgium. Isn’t that weird? Instead of translating the word “hangover” into French, the distributors released the film under an English-language title that was different from the original title! Why would they do that?

Anyway, this commenter is saying that Sea Water Bliss bassist Andrew Hall looks like the co-star of The Hangover, Zach Galifianakis. See the resemblance?

Zach Galiafanakis and Andrew Hall

Zach Galifianakis and Andrew Hall

Mmm…maybe a little in the beard area?

This is just one more example of the fun that can come from using StepRep to monitor your online reputation. And that’s my contribution to StepRep’s marketing efforts for today. Now where’d I put that crossword puzzle…?

Cartooning around the office.

November 16th, 2009 by Michael A. Charles

Since I don’t have time to make animated cartoons any more – and how’d that happen, by the way? – I’ve been spending a lot more time drawing static comics lately. At first I thought this would be a good deal easier. Since the images didn’t have to move, I figured, I could churn out ten times as many of them.

Alas, it’s not so easy. The movement in the foreground of an animated cartoon lets you get away with simple solid colours behind, whereas a comic, I’ve discovered, looks empty unless you put some scenery behind the characters. As another example, when I was making the Spokesmonster cartoons we always saw him from the same head-on perspective, so I just re-used the same three monster heads over and over again; comics demand a little more variation in the perspective, so each individual figure needs to be drawn.

Having spent many hours over the past few weeks creating this comic for my co-worker’s band Sexy Mathematics, and many more hours creating this other comic for the StepRep platform for online business directories, I have a renewed respect for real comic book artists, who have to churn out a twenty-page issue every month. Of course, they’ve got an unfair advantage over me: they actually know how to draw. Me, I have to take photos of my subjects and painstakingly trace them.

Chris & cartoon Chris Nicole & cartoon Nicole

So thanks to Chris and Liz from Sexy Mathematics, and to Nicole and Tavis who posed for the StepRep comic. (Consider growing sideburns, Tavis. Seriously.)

Crashing the Windows 7 launch party.

September 28th, 2009 by Michael A. Charles

We don’t have much of an advertising budget here at StepRep. To the extent that there’s a marketing department, I’m it. So I’m always jealous of other companies that can afford to shoot promotional videos with paid actors, real lights, decent sound, and so on.

But then sometimes you see the videos that these other companies choose to invest their energies in, and it makes you wonder.

Behold, Microsoft’s preparations for the Windows 7 Launch Party!

Perfect. It really can’t be improved upon. Unless…just maybe

Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2

In the other blogs…

September 24th, 2009 by Michael A. Charles

First off, and most importantly, look at the picture on the left. Neat, huh. I killed an hour yesterday drawing it. I like the girl’s raccoon-eyes and the Eurotrashy look of the guy with the moustache. What does this image have to do with StepRep? Nothing, but I used it to accentuate a recent post on the StepRep blog about being secretive. (We’re against it.)

Meanwhile on the MyFrontSteps blog I’m really focussed on explaining what MyFrontSteps is all about: Finding and sharing trusted local services. We were a little wobbly on this concept for a while, but we’re going to work harder to make it clear to people. We’re calling our strategy adjustment Plan B.

Some thoughts on health care reform.

September 8th, 2009 by Michael A. Charles

Just kidding. Even if I had an opinion about how the United States should fix its health care system – which, as a Canadian, I don’t – this wouldn’t be the place to air it.

But over the long weekend I was reading this article by David Goldhill in the Atlantic. Goldhill argues that the problem with American health care is that it’s not paid for directly by the consumers – sick people – but by the insurance industry. He points out how weird this is:

We can’t imagine paying for gas with our auto-insurance policy, or for our electric bills with our homeowners insurance, but we all assume that our regular checkups and dental cleanings will be covered at least partially by insurance.

So unlike other businesses, which have to focus on good service and competitive pricing to attract customers, health care providers can get away with half-assed service and Byzantine pricing schemes because their real customers aren’t the poor chumps in the paper gowns, but the insurance companies.

Goldhill also writes – and I’m arriving at the point, here, so stay with me:

It’s astonishingly difficult for consumers to find any health-care information that would enable them to make informed choices – based not just on price, but on quality of care or the rate of preventable medical errors.

It’s a matter for democratic debate whether health care should be a consumer good like any other; whether it should be paid for out of pocket, or by an insurance company, or by the government. But I think everyone would agree that citizens ought to be able to shop for a doctor in the same straightforward way that they shop for other services – by comparing prices, by looking for reviews online, and by asking their friends who they recommend.

Correction. I suppose there’s one group that would disagree: bad doctors.

People who are bad at their jobs rely on consumer confusion to keep themselves in business. No-one deliberately goes to a bad doctor twice; but many of us are too ill-informed to tell the difference between good medical care and bad.

The same applies, of course, for any industry. People innocently give their business to reckless real estate agents, clumsy carpenters, and visionless videographers.

Obviously, consumers suffer. And competent real estate agents, carpenters, and videographers suffer, because they lose business to hacks. You could even argue that the hacks suffer – they lurch along in careers they’re lousy at, instead of getting a clear economic signal that they ought to try a different line of work.

I think of StepRep and MyFrontSteps as an alliance between consumers and competent service providers. By connecting with the businesses they know and trust, people can steer their friends toward experts that won’t rip them off.

As you can see, this post has very little to do with health care. But it has everything to do with reform – reforming the way consumers think. We’re no longer powerless, even when we’re sitting in a waiting room wearing a drafty paper gown. The internet has given us amazing new tools for evaluating the quality of the services we pay for. We’ve just gotta start using them.

A possibly clever idea abandoned.

August 24th, 2009 by Michael A. Charles

Originally this post over at the MyFrontSteps blog – which is loosely based on a real conversation I had with a friend this weekend – was going to be done in comic book form. But I realized that the amount of effort involved (assuming twenty or so frames, it would probably have taken me the better part of a week) was disproportionate to whatever promotional value the project might have had. So I contented myself with drawing the first frame and typing up the rest of the post in plain ol’ dialogue style, which only took a couple hours.

More thoughts on advertising…

August 17th, 2009 by Michael A. Charles

A couple weeks ago Brendan and Jeff took off to San Francisco for the Inman Real Estate Connect conference. They arranged for a little demo booth where they would show off StepRep and MyFrontSteps to fellow conference-goers. So before they left, Jeff asked me to come up with a screensaver they could put on their demo laptop.

Jeff told me had nothing more elaborate in mind than a MyFrontSteps logo bouncing around on a white screen. But I had a little extra time on my hands, so I came up with something a little fancier – an animated overview of the MyFrontSteps strategy for changing the way businesses advertise.

After they got back from the conference I snazzed up the 1-minute screensaver with a little musical accompaniment (a 1935 tune called “Every Little Moment” by the Dorsey Brothers Orchestra) and stuck it up on YouTube.

But instead of letting you watch it here, I’m going to send you over to a new post on the StepRep blog, enigmatically titled If John Wanamaker were alive today…

Please remain calm, we're trying to entertain you.

July 21st, 2009 by Michael A. Charles

Every once in a while I’ll get an email from my father drawing my attention to some online advertising campaign that he thinks I’ll find interesting. I imagine it’s his way of encouraging me: “Hey, son, it’s not only your crazy company trying to promote itself on YouTube – real businesses are doing it too!”

Thus was I recently directed to FedEx’s new YouTube campaign starring Fred Willard (whom you know from movies like Waiting For Guffman and Best In Show, and of course as the CEO of Buy N Large). Willard stars in a series of mock infomercials (directed by Bob Odenkirk, of Mr. Show fame) called 1-2-3 Succeed!

They’re pretty funny.

Despite being covered in the business section of the New York Times, the campaign hasn’t exactly caught fire. As of Tuesday evening, none of the videos has been viewed more than 10,000 times. These are Spokesmonster-like numbers; it’s nice to know I’m competing on the same plane (if not quite at the same salary) as Odenkirk and Willard. But despite the slow start, I hope the ads are a success. Not for FedEx’s sake, but for the sake of the advertising biz.

I’m not saying the future of the advertising industry rests on the success or failure of this one campaign. I just think they’re good ads, and I’d like to see more like them. But take a look at some of the comments on FedEx’s YouTube page:

[T]his type of humor is low-brow and incompatible with the sophistication that consumers expect from FedEx.

Throw it away and start over. Not funny or informative. Worst FedEx ad campaign ever….

This is the dumbest thing I’ve ever seen. The marketing group at FedEx that put this out should be on the chopping block. Dumb, stupid, boring, and won’t bring any customers to FedEx so is therefore a waste of money. I think I threw up a bit in my mouth these are so bad.

…Not that it’s hard to find YouTube commenters to say mean things about your video. But the early response reminds me of other innocuous ad campaigns that backfired – like those Microsoft ads with Jerry Seinfeld that everyone hated so much. Or this reviled Motrin ad from last year. Why is it that when advertisers try to be a little inventive, they often enrage as many customers as they amuse? Meanwhile, there’s no penalty for being dull and predictable. We don’t even notice the boring ads – they pass through our buzzing brains like busboys through a fashionable restaurant, eyes down, trying not to draw attention to themselves. Every once in a while one of the busboys dares to give us a smile, and we respond by lashing him with our walking sticks.

I can understand why people dislike Microsoft, and I can therefore understand how those people might dislike the Seinfeld Microsoft ads. What’s strange to me is that those same people seemed to dislike the Seinfeld ads much more intensely than they did all of the far more banal ads that came before and after it. You’d think Microsoft would have gotten some credit for trying something different, but it seems that people resented the attempt much more than they resented the ad itself.

“How dare you try to entertain us,” they said. “Go on about your unseemly business, just don’t make us look at you.”

We citizens of the mass-consumer age have a fraught relationship with the advertising industry. It surrounds us – we swim in it like the ocean – and maybe these ads frustrate us not because we really think they’re that bad, but simply because we notice them at all – and for a few seconds they remind us how far we are from dry land.

Goin' Viral!

June 23rd, 2009 by Michael A. Charles

The last time we saw the Spokesmonster he was knuckle-walking off into the sunset, his life having been perfected by StepRep. Now it’s MyFrontSteps that needs a promotional push, so our beloved mascot has been forced to cancel his retirement plans.

(Watch for a cameo by MyFrontSteps CEO Brendan King!)

StepRep is newer, homier than ever.

June 18th, 2009 by Michael A. Charles

Over at the StepRep Blog, I sing of the many wonders of the brand new StepRep homepage. (Or are we calling it the “dashboard”? I’m not sure if we’ve decided yet. To my mind it’s definitely more homepagey than dashboardy, but I’m ready to be convinced.)

It’s a pretty big change. Most of our previous updates have been off in the margins where they could be easily ignored. This one’s hard to miss. Go check it out.